Corrections log
When a factual claim on this site turns out to be wrong, it is fixed and logged here with the date and what changed. Nothing is quietly edited. Not one of the large sites in this niche publishes a corrections log.
When this site gets something wrong, the fix is logged here — what was wrong, what it says now, and the date it changed. Nothing is quietly edited.
Why this page exists
Before building this site I read the trust pages of the biggest exam and recruitment sites in India. Not one of them publishes a corrections log. On several, the corrections policy URL returns an error page. One stamps its articles with an “Officially Verified” badge and never says anywhere what was verified, by whom, or against what.
That is a problem for you, not for them. A site that never records a change is a site that cannot tell you the figure you relied on in March was revised in June. The page just silently becomes something else.
So: every correction to a factual claim on this site gets a row here. Permanently.
What counts as a correction
A row gets added when a factual claim changes — a figure, a date, a rule, an eligibility condition, a name, or a link that pointed somewhere wrong.
Fixing a typo, rewording a sentence or adding a new section is not a correction and does not get logged. Neither does a routine re-check that found nothing changed; that just updates the checked-on date in the guide’s Sources block.
The log
Nothing logged yet. This site published on 24 August 2026, and no factual claim has needed correcting since. When one does, it appears here with the date.
An empty log on a new site means nothing has been corrected yet. It is not a claim that nothing is wrong. If you have found something, the next section is what to do.
How to report a mistake
Email [email protected] with the page address and what is wrong with it.
The most useful reports name the official document that contradicts the page — the notification, the Office Memorandum, the Gazette entry. With that, a fix takes minutes. Without it, the claim still gets re-checked against the source, it just takes longer.
If a guide here disagrees with the official notification, the notification is right and this site is wrong. That is not a courtesy, it is how the rule actually works: the commission’s document is the rule, and everything on this site is only a description of it.